A recent comment on our other website from somebody who read about Karl Lueders’ bizarre posts that were on his own blog had this to say:
I bet you would have liked to have read his posts before hiring him. The upside is that not only did he make himself look like a moron but he is helping in a big way to educate the public about what sort of person he is. I hope he is stupid enough to try to come after you, so you can point out to his crack team of legal experts that he trashed himself on his own blog. It’s going to be hard to make a case that you damaged him when it’s clear that he damaged his own reputation in so many ways.
Good luck to you guys, looks like you’re nnot letting this get you down, good for you.
That’s kind of been our question for awhile now.. in this market especially, how can you claim that WE are causing damages when YOU have publicly, repeatedly embarrassed yourself and damaged your OWN reputation?
We will likely have the answer to that question soon..
This is bullshit…..Karl is nothing more than a wonderful man with a big, sincere heart who would give the shirt off of his back to someone in need.
To me, this blog only serves as a self-portrait of your own stupidity and your pathetic attempt at trying to refocus blame upon someone else by defamation of their good character.
Karl Lueders DOES NOT SUCK but you, the “so-called brains” behind this reprehensible site are an obvious pompous ass!!
GET A LIFE………..
Now here we go again. Why is it that no one defending Karl can make a comment without using curse words, overused rejoinders or calling people names? It’s like they follow guidelines from bad internet trolls, or maybe that’s exactly what they are. Okay, allow me to retort.
CJJ or kandra1409@msn.com 65.71.133.57
We’re thrilled that you like Karl but you know, he wasn’t able to make us take the site down because we haven’t told a lie. So he does in fact suck and he lied at our closing. If you took the time to read the things he’s said about himself you’d see that your belief in him is misplaced. He admits to being a thief, a liar and a drunk amongst a whole bunch of other things, in writing. So if you have a problem with Karl being defamed, you should take that problem up with the person who did more defaming of him than we ever did, that would be KARL LUEDERS.
With your limited vocabulary of curse words and your lame defense of Karl you’re doing him no favors.
Oh and seriously? GAL? This statement alone tells me exactly what we’re dealing with here. It’s about the lamest rejoinder there is and proves it’s YOU that needs to get or find one. You make me giggle.